ArticlePharmaceutics2022
Stable Cavitation-Mediated Delivery of miR-126 to Endothelial Cells.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic ultrasound-microbubble therapy promotes wound healing through miR-26b-5p-mediated GSK3β suppression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Focused ultrasound and microbubble-mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein to human induced pluripotent stem cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Effect of Drug Loading on the Acoustic Response of Nanobubbles in Stable and Inertial Cavitation Regimes.IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Extracellular vesicles derived from endothelial progenitor cells modified by Houshiheisan promote angiogenesis and attenuate cerebral ischemic injury via miR-126/PIK3R2.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mesenchymal stem cell cryopreservation with cavitation-mediated trehalose treatment.Communications engineering · 2024Article
- Immunomodulation of human T cells by microbubble-mediated focused ultrasound.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Cavitation-Enhanced Drug Delivery and Immunotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In endothelial cells, microRNA-126 (miR-126) promotes angiogenesis, and modulating the intracellular levels of this gene could suggest a method to treat cardiovascular diseases such as ischemia. Novel ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles offer a means to deliver therapeutic payloads to target cells and sites of disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of gene delivery by stimulating miR-126-decorated microbubbles using gentle acoustic conditions (stable cavitation). A cationic DSTAP microbubble was formulated and characterized to carry 6 µg of a miR-126 payload per 109 microbubbles. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were treated at 20−40% duty cycle with miR-126-conjugated microbubbles in a custom ultrasound setup coupled with a passive cavitation detection system. Transfection efficiency was assessed by RT-qPCR, Western blotting, and endothelial tube formation assay, while HUVEC viability was monitored by MTT assay. With increasing duty cycle, the trend observed was an increase in intracellular miR-126 levels, up to a 2.3-fold increase, as well as a decrease in SPRED1 (by 33%) and PIK3R2 (by 46%) expression, two salient miR-126 targets. Under these ultrasound parameters, HUVECs maintained >95% viability after 96 h. The present work describes the delivery of a proangiogenic miR-126 using an ultrasound-responsive cationic microbubble with potential to stimulate therapeutic angiogenesis while minimizing endothelial damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.