Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559047›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

A Bioluminescence-Based Ex Vivo Burn Wound Model for Real-Time Assessment of Novel Phage-Inspired Enzybiotics.

Vincent De Maesschalck, Diana Gutiérrez, Jan Paeshuyse, Yves Briers, Greetje Vande Velde, Rob Lavigne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of Rapid and Economic In Vitro Assay and Biorelevant Ex Vivo Biofilm Inhibition Wound Model to Test the Antibacterial Efficacy of Wound Dressings.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent De MaesschalckDepartment of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-6166
Diana GutiérrezDepartment of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Jan PaeshuyseDepartment of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2396-354X
Yves BriersDepartment of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7723-1040
Greetje Vande VeldeBiomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-3993
Rob LavigneDepartment of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7377-1314

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders G066919N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The silent pandemic of antibiotic resistance is thriving, prompting the urgent need for the development of new antibacterial drugs. However, within the preclinical pipeline, in vitro screening conditions can differ significantly from the final in vivo settings. To bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo assays, we developed a pig-skin-based bioluminescent ex vivo burn wound infection model, enabling real-time assessment of antibacterials in a longitudinal, non-destructive manner. We provide a proof-of-concept for

Indexed as

antimicrobial activity screeningbioluminescenceex vivo modellysin

Identifiers

PMID36559047
PMCPMC9781546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.