Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36559041›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

A Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling UPLC-MS/MS Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Tacrolimus, Mycophenolic Acid and Creatinine in Whole Blood of Renal Transplant Recipients.

Xueqiao Wang, Xinhua Dai, Shiqi Wan, Yu Fan, Lijuan Wu, Huan Xu, Lin Yan, Xingxin Gong, Yamei Li, Yao Luo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of hematocrit-adjusted conversion strategies for mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus monitoring using volumetric absorptive microsampling in lung and renal transplant recipients.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xueqiao WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-5137
Xinhua DaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shiqi WanThe Outpatient Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yu FanDepartment of Urology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Organ Transplantation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lijuan WuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Huan XuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Lin YanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Xingxin GongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yamei LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yao LuoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-3504
Yangjuan BaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

the 1·3·5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University No. ZYJC18004the 1·3·5 Project for Incubation, West China Hospital, Sichuan University No. 19HXFH023the Key Research and Development Project of the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province No: 2020YFS0228 and 2021YFS0160the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University No. Z20201011the National Natural Science Foundation No. 82102466, No. 81871713the Special Supportive Program for Organ Transplantation by COTDF No. 2019JYJH08West China Nursing Discipline Development Special Fund Project No. HXHL21014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Continuous monitoring of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolic acid (MPA), and creatinine (Cre) after renal transplantation is vitally important. In this study, we developed a new method based on volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) combined with Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) to simultaneously quantify three analytes including TAC, MPA, and Cre in whole blood. (2) Methods: The VAMS-based UPLC-MS/MS assay used a shared extraction and a single injection to simultaneously quantify the included TAC, MPA, and Cre. Development and validation were carried out following the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines for the validation of bioanalytical methods. Moreover, clinical validation for the three analytes was performed in both dried blood spot (DBS) and VAMS. Furthermore, a willingness survey was conducted using the system usability scale (SUS) for renal transplant recipients. (3) Results: The assay was successfully validated for all analytes. No interference, carryover, or matrix effects were observed, and extraction recoveries and process efficiencies were >90.00%. Analysis was unaffected by hematocrit (0.20~0.60, L/L) and anticoagulants (EDTA-2K). Dried VAMS samples were stable for 7 days at ambient temperature and stable for at least 1 month at −20 °C. During clinical validation, the measured TAC, corrected MPA, and Cre concentrations of VAMS samples met the analytical standards (95.00%, 88.57%, and 92.50%). When more stringent clinical acceptance criteria were set, the results obtained by VAMS (90.00%, 71.43%, and 85.00%) better than DBS (77.50%, 62.86%, and 70.00%). Compared with DBS, the survey found that renal transplant recipients are more inclined to use VAMS. (4) Conclusions: A robust extraction and UPLC-MS/MS analysis method in VAMS tips was developed and fully validated for the simultaneous quantification of TAC, MPA, and Cre concentrations. This method provides analytical support for the one-sample remote monitoring of both immunosuppressive drug concentrations and renal function in allo-renal recipients. Based on the good consistency between this method and the routine detection of venous blood samples and higher patient satisfaction than DBS, we believe that VAMS sampling can be a better alternative to venous whole-blood sampling.

Indexed as

creatininemycophenolic acidrenal transplantationtacrolimusUPLC-MS/MSVAMS

Identifiers

PMID36559041
PMCPMC9788011
OpenAlexW4309570914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.