Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36558825›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Jacek Osek, Kinga Wieczorek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Efficacy of Cannabidiol in Reducing Virulence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Impact of the defined Oligo-MMScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Luteolin Inhibits Invasion ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Synthetic toehold biosensors for detectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Dynamic Modelling ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Bioprotective Strategies to ControlInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacek OsekDepartment of Hygiene of Food of Animal Origin, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-8837
Kinga WieczorekDepartment of Hygiene of Food of Animal Origin, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8268-3885
National Veterinary Research Institute · PL

Funding

National Veterinary Research Institute None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeriosis is a serious food-borne illness, especially in susceptible populations, including children, pregnant women, and elderlies. The disease can occur in two forms: non-invasive febrile gastroenteritis and severe invasive listeriosis with septicemia, meningoencephalitis, perinatal infections, and abortion. Expression of each symptom depends on various bacterial virulence factors, immunological status of the infected person, and the number of ingested bacteria. Internalins, mainly InlA and InlB, invasins (invasin A, LAP), and other surface adhesion proteins (InlP1, InlP4) are responsible for epithelial cell binding, whereas internalin C (InlC) and actin assembly-inducing protein (ActA) are involved in cell-to-cell bacterial spread.

Indexed as

host infectionlisteriosisL. monocytogenesmolecular mechanismsvirulence traits

Identifiers

PMID36558825
PMCPMC9783847
OpenAlexW4311852923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.