Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36558097›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Analysis of Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex Using an Electronic Nose and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Multivariate Statistical Analysis.

Li Sun, Jing Wu, Kang Wang, Tiantian Liang, Quanhui Liu, Junfeng Yan, Ying Yang, Ke Qiao, Sui Ma, Di Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential Chemical Components Analysis ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li SunXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Jing WuXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Kang WangXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Tiantian LiangXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Quanhui LiuXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Junfeng YanXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Ying YangXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Ke QiaoXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Sui MaXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Di WangXiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441000, China.
Xiangyang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Research and development program of Science and Technology Major Project of Hubei Province Grant No. 2020ACA007Scientific Research Project of Drug Administration of Hubei Province Grant No. 20200116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese Herbal Medicines (CHMs) can be identified by experts according to their odors. However, the identification of these medicines is subjective and requires long-term experience. The samples of Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex used were dried cortexes, which are often confused in the market due to their similar appearance, but their chemical composition and odor are different. The clinical use of the two herbs is different, but the phenomenon of being confused with each other often occurs. Therefore, we used an electronic nose (E-nose) to explore the differences in odor information between the two species for fast and robust discrimination, in order to provide a scientific basis for avoiding confusion and misuse in the process of production, circulation and clinical use. In this study, the odor and volatile components of these two medicinal materials were detected by the E-nose and by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), respectively. An E-nose combined with pattern analysis methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) was used to discriminate the cortex samples. The E-nose was used to determine the odors of the samples and enable rapid differentiation of Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex. GC-MS was utilized to reveal the differences between the volatile constituents of Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex. In all, 82 components including 9 co-contained components were extracted by chromatographic peak integration and matching, and 24 constituents could be used as chemical markers to distinguish these two species. The E-nose detection technology is able to discriminate between Acanthopanacis Cortex and Periplocae Cortex, with GC-MS providing support to determine the material basis of the E-nose sensors' response. The proposed method is rapid, simple, eco-friendly and can successfully differentiate these two medicinal materials by their odors. It can be applied to quality control links such as online detection, and also provide reference for the establishment of other rapid detection methods. The further development and utilization of this technology is conducive to the further supervision of the quality of CHMs and the healthy development of the industry.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseVolatile Organic CompoundsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMultivariate AnalysisOdorantsQuality ControlVolatile Organic CompoundsAcanthopanacis CortexChinese Herbal Medicineselectronic nosegas chromatography-mass spectrometrymultivariate statistical analysisodor identificationPeriplocae Cortexsensors

Identifiers

PMID36558097
PMCPMC9781861
OpenAlexW4312196353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.