Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557908›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Review of the Influence of Various Extraction Techniques and the Biological Effects of the Xanthones from Mangosteen (

Vasin Yuvanatemiya, Pao Srean, Wiyada Kwanhian Klangbud, Karthikeyan Venkatachalam, Jittimon Wongsa, Thanya Parametthanuwat, Narin Charoenphun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alzheimer's disease: unraveling role of xanthone derivatives and nanocarriers.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Extraction of bioactive compounds fromJournal of food science and technology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Green Co-Extractant-Assisted Supercritical COFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasin YuvanatemiyaFaculty of Marine Technology, Burapha University, Chanthaburi Campus, Thamai, Chanthaburi 22170, Thailand.
Pao SreanFaculty of Agriculture and Food Processing, National University of Battambang, Battambang 020101, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-2330-9660
Wiyada Kwanhian KlangbudCenter of Excellence Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Thasala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-166X
Karthikeyan VenkatachalamFaculty of Innovative Agriculture and Fishery Establishment Project, Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Makham Tia, Mueang, Surat Thani 84000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1028-0590
Jittimon WongsaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering for Industry, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Management, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Prachinburi Campus, Prachinburi 25230, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-8893
Thanya ParametthanuwatDepartment of Agricultural Engineering for Industry, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Management, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Prachinburi Campus, Prachinburi 25230, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-2218
Narin CharoenphunFaculty of Science and Arts, Burapha University, Chanthaburi Campus, Thamai, Chanthaburi 22170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7691-7665
Burapha University · THKing Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok · THPrince of Songkla University · THUniversity of Battambang · KHWalailak University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xanthones are significant bioactive compounds and secondary metabolites in mangosteen pericarps. A xanthone is a phenolic compound and versatile scaffold that consists of a tricyclic xanthene-9-one structure. A xanthone may exist in glycosides, aglycones, monomers or polymers. It is well known that xanthones possess a multitude of beneficial properties, including antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory activity, and antimicrobial properties. Additionally, xanthones can be used as raw material and/or an ingredient in many food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic applications. Although xanthones can be used in various therapeutic and functional applications, their properties and stability are determined by their extraction procedures. Extracting high-quality xanthones from mangosteen with effective therapeutic effects could be challenging if the extraction method is insufficient. Although several extraction processes are in use today, their efficiency has not yet been rigorously evaluated. Therefore, selecting an appropriate extraction procedure is imperative to recover substantial yields of xanthones with enhanced functionality from mangosteens. Hence, the present review will assist in establishing a precise scenario for finding the most appropriate extraction method for xanthones from mangosteen pericarp by critically analyzing various conventional and unconventional extraction methods and their ability to preserve the stability and biological effects of xanthones.

Indexed as

Garcinia mangostanaXanthonesAntioxidantsFruitPlant ExtractsAntioxidantsPlant ExtractsXanthonesby-productsextractionmangosteenpericarpsprocessxanthones

Identifiers

PMID36557908
PMCPMC9782657
OpenAlexW4312126497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.