Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557792›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Interactions of Apigenin and Safranal with the 5HT1A and 5HT2A Receptors and Behavioral Effects in Depression and Anxiety: A Molecular Docking, Lipid-Mediated Molecular Dynamics, and In Vivo Analysis.

Faiq Amin, Mahmoud A A Ibrahim, Syed Rizwan-Ul-Hasan, Saima Khaliq, Gamal A Gabr, Muhammad, Asra Khan, Peter A Sidhom, Prashant Tikmani, Ahmed M Shawky and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Faiq AminDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Mahmoud A A IbrahimComputational Chemistry Laboratory, Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-4819-2040
Syed Rizwan-Ul-HasanDepartment of Computer Science, DHA Suffa University, Karachi 75500, Pakistan.
Saima KhaliqDepartment of Biochemistry, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi 75300, Pakistan.
Gamal A GabrDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-9952
MuhammadDepartment of Biochemistry, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi 75300, Pakistan.
Asra KhanDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Peter A SidhomDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2579-6351
Prashant TikmaniDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Ahmed M ShawkyScience and Technology Unit (STU), Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3035-661X
Saara AhmadDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Syed Hani AbidiDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9497-0902
Aga Khan University · PKFederal Urdu University · PKDHA Suffa University · PKMinia University · EGPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SATanta University · EGUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

Higher Education Commission 3941 and 9447Science and Technology Development Fund 5480 & 7972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study utilizes in silico molecular docking/molecular dynamics to evaluate the binding affinity of apigenin and safranal with 5HT1AR/5HT2AR, followed by assessment of in vivo effects of these compounds on depressive and anxious behavior.

methodsThe docking between apigenin and safranal and the 5HT1A and 5HT2A receptors was performed utilizing AutoDock Vina software, while MD and protein-lipid molecular dynamics simulations were executed by AMBER16 software. For in vivo analysis, healthy control (HC), disease control (DC), fluoxetine-, and apigenin-safranal-treated rats were tested for changes in depression and anxiety using the forced swim test (FST) and the elevated plus-maze test (EPMT), respectively.

resultsThe binding affinity estimations identified the superior interacting capacity of apigenin over safranal for 5HT1A/5HT2A receptors over 200 ns MD simulations. Both compounds exhibit oral bioavailability and absorbance. In the rodent model, there was a significant increase in the overall mobility time in the FST, while in the EPMT, there was a decrease in latency and an increase in the number of entries for the treated and HC rats compared with the DC rats, suggesting a reduction in depressive/anxiety symptoms after treatment.

conclusionsOur analyses suggest apigenin and safranal as prospective medication options to treat depression and anxiety.

Indexed as

ApigeninMolecular Dynamics SimulationAnimalsAnxietyCyclohexenesDepressionLipidsMolecular Docking SimulationProspective StudiesRatsTerpenesApigeninCyclohexenesLipidssafranalTerpenesanxietydepressionmolecular docking and dynamicsmurine modelnatural compoundsserotonin receptors

Identifiers

PMID36557792
PMCPMC9783496
OpenAlexW4311852521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.