ReviewMicroorganisms2022
Ciliate Morpho-Taxonomy and Practical Considerations before Deploying Metabarcoding to Ciliate Community Diversity Surveys in Urban Receiving Waters.
Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Internal transcribed spacers enable species-level Metataxonomic analysis of ciliated protozoa.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Insights into freshwater ciliate diversity through high throughput DNA metabarcoding.FEMS microbes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disentangling biodiversity and community assembly effects on ecosystem function has always been an important topic in ecological research. The development and application of a DNA metabarcoding method has fundamentally changed the way we describe prokaryotic communities and estimate biodiversity. Compared to prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea), the eukaryotic microbes (unicellular eukaryotes) also fulfill extremely important ecological functions in different ecosystems regarding their intermediate trophic positions. For instance, ciliated microbes (accounting for a substantial portion of the diversity of unicellular eukaryotes) perform pivotal roles in microbial loops and are essential components in different ecosystems, especially in water purification processes. Therefore, the community composition of ciliated species has been widely utilized as a proxy for water quality and biological assessment in urban river ecosystems and WWTPs (wastewater treatment plants). Unfortunately, investigating the dynamic changes and compositions in ciliate communities relies heavily on existing morpho-taxonomical descriptions, which is limited by traditional microscopic approaches. To deal with this dilemma, we discuss the DNA-based taxonomy of ciliates, the relative merits and challenges of deploying its application using DNA metabarcoding for surveys of ciliate community diversity in urban waterbodies, and provide suggestions for minimizing relevant sources of biases in its implementation. We expect that DNA metabarcoding could untangle relationships between community assembly and environmental changes affecting ciliate communities. These analyses and discussions could offer a replicable method in support of the application of evaluating communities of ciliated protozoa as indicators of urban freshwater ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.