Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557716›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Effects of Isolated LAB on Chemical Composition, Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community of

Mingjian Liu, Yu Wang, Zhijun Wang, Jian Bao, Muqier Zhao, Gentu Ge, Yushan Jia, Shuai Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mingjian LiuKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-4167
Yu WangKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Zhijun WangKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Jian BaoKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Muqier ZhaoKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Gentu GeKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Yushan JiaKey Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, China, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, China, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Shuai DuNational Engineering Laboratory of Biological Feed Safety and Pollution Prevention and Control, Key Laboratory of Molecular Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Feed Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Funding

Yushan Jia 2021 - National Dairy Centre - 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to screen and identify lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains from the Stipa grandis and naturally fermented silage, and assess their effects on the silage quality and bacterial community of Stipa grandis after 60 days of the fermentation process. A total of 38 LAB were isolated, and strains ZX301 and YX34 were identified as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus pentosaceus using 16S rRNA sequences; they can normally grow at 10−30 °C, with a tolerance of pH and NaCl from 3.5 to 8.0 and 3 to 6.5%, respectively. Subsequently, the two isolated LAB and one commercial additive (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) were added to Stipa grandis for ensiling for 60 days and recorded as the ZX301, YX34, and P treatments. The addition of LAB was added at 1 × 105 colony-forming unit/g of fresh weight, and the same amount of distilled water was sprayed to serve as a control treatment (CK). Compared to the CK treatment, the ZX301 and YX34 treatments exhibited a positive effect on pH reduction. The water-soluble carbohydrate content was significantly (p < 0.05) increased in ZX301, YX34, and P treatments than in CK treatment. At the genus level, the bacterial community in Stipa grandis silage involves a shift from Pantoea to Lactiplantibacillus. Compared to the CK treatment, the ZX301, YX34, and P treatments significantly (p < 0.05) increase the abundance of Pediococcus and Lactiplantibacillus, respectively. Consequently, the results indicated that the addition of LAB reconstructed microbiota and influenced silage quality. The strain ZX301 could improve the ensiling performance in Stipa grandis silage.

Indexed as

bacterial communityisolationlactic acid bacteriasilage qualityStipa grandis

Identifiers

PMID36557716
PMCPMC9787380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.