ReviewMicroorganisms2022
Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Treatment of
Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical response and risk factors of fecal microbiota transplantation in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for viral diseases: A systematic review of clinical trials.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Transplantation of encapsulated fecal microbiota: research progress and future trends.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Review
- Protocol for a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of fecal microbiota transplantation for adolescent anorexia nervosa.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Use of gross total resection and adjunctive therapy in treatment of spinal column tumors in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Advances in gut microbiota research among pediatric patients with sleep-disordered breathing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of the natural product α-mangostin against Clostridioides difficile.PloS one · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota and microbial metabolites for osteoporosis.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- From chaos to order: optimizing fecal microbiota transplantation for enhanced immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Current state of microbiota clinical applications in neonatal and pediatric bacterial infections.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Review
- Possible Applications of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: current challenges and future landscapes.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Review
- Microbiome-Related and Infection Control Approaches to Primary and Secondary Prevention ofMicroorganisms · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Cases of Clostridioides difficile infection have been rising among the pediatric and adolescent population. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as an alternative therapy for recurrent C. difficile infection. We aim to perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for C. difficile infection in children and adolescents. Methods: A literature search was performed using variations of the keywords “pediatrics”, “C. difficile infection”, and “fecal microbiota transplantation” in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from inception to 30 June 2022. The resulting 575 articles were independently screened by three authors. Fourteen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Results: The pooled success rate of FMT in the overall cohort was 86% (95% confidence interval: 77−95%; p < 0.001; I2 = 70%). There were 38 serious adverse events in 36 patients with a pooled rate of 2.0% (95% confidence interval: 0.0−3.0%; p = 0.1; I2 = 0.0%) and 47 adverse events in 45 patients with a pooled rate of 15% (95% confidence interval: 5.0−25.0%; p = 0.02; I2 = 54.0%). There was no death associated with FMT. Conclusions: FMT was concluded to be an effective and safe therapy in pediatric and adolescent patients with C. difficile infection. Underlying comorbidities may impede the efficacy. A rigorous screening process of the donors is recommended prior to embarking on FMT. There is no universal and cost-effective way to monitor the long-term outcomes of FMT. While promising, metagenomic sequencing may not be available in settings with limited resources. Robust data from randomized clinical trials is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.