Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557616›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Malolactic Fermentation: New Approaches to Old Problems.

Junwei Fu, Ling Wang, Jingxian Sun, Ning Ju, Gang Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Optimization of fluidized bed drying ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junwei FuSchool of Food and Wine, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.
Ling WangSchool of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.
Jingxian SunSchool of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.
Ning JuSchool of Food and Wine, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.
Gang JinSchool of Food and Wine, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-6451

Funding

Department of Ningxia Science and Technology No. 2022BDE03011National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 32160578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malolactic fermentation (MLF) is the decarboxylation of L-malic acid to L-lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). For the majority of wine production, secondary fermentation is crucial. MLF significantly impacts the quality of most red and some white wine. The outcomes of the spontaneously initiated and finished MLF are frequently unpredictable and can even cause the wine to deteriorate. As a result, individuals typically favour inoculating superior starter cultures when performing MLF. The MLF method for wine has, however, faced new difficulties because of the altered wine fermentation substrate environment brought on by global climate change, the growing demands of winemakers for production efficiency, and the rising demand for high-quality wine. To serve as a reference for the study of wine production and MLF in the current situation, this review primarily updates and summarises the research findings on increasing the effectiveness and dependability of MLF in recent years.

Indexed as

global climate changelactic acid bacteriamalolactic fermentationwine quality

Identifiers

PMID36557616
PMCPMC9781322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.