ArticleMicromachines2022
Predicting the Optimal Input Parameters for the Desired Print Quality Using Machine Learning.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling and experimental validation of mechanical-microstructural relationships in 3D-printed Onyx-fibre composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing is a growing technology being incorporated into almost every industry. Although it has obvious advantages, such as precision and less fabrication time, it has many shortcomings. Although several attempts were made to monitor the errors, many have not been able to thoroughly address them, like stringing, over-extrusion, layer shifting, and overheating. This paper proposes a study using machine learning to identify the optimal process parameters such as infill structure and density, material (ABS, PLA, Nylon, PVA, and PETG), wall and layer thickness, count, and temperature. The result thus obtained was used to train a machine learning algorithm. Four different network architectures (CNN, Resnet152, MobileNet, and Inception V3) were used to build the algorithm. The algorithm was able to predict the parameters for a given requirement. It was also able to detect any errors. The algorithm was trained to pause the print immediately in case of a mistake. Upon comparison, it was found that the algorithm built with Inception V3 achieved the best accuracy of 97%. The applications include saving the material from being wasted due to print time errors in the manufacturing industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.