Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557530›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2022

Predicting the Optimal Input Parameters for the Desired Print Quality Using Machine Learning.

Rajalakshmi Ratnavel, Shreya Viswanath, Jeyanthi Subramanian, Vinoth Kumar Selvaraj, Valarmathi Prahasam, Sanjay Siddharth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rajalakshmi RatnavelSchool of Computer Science Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6570-483X
Shreya ViswanathSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Jeyanthi SubramanianSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Vinoth Kumar SelvarajSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Valarmathi PrahasamSchool of Computer Science Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.
Sanjay SiddharthSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-0613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing is a growing technology being incorporated into almost every industry. Although it has obvious advantages, such as precision and less fabrication time, it has many shortcomings. Although several attempts were made to monitor the errors, many have not been able to thoroughly address them, like stringing, over-extrusion, layer shifting, and overheating. This paper proposes a study using machine learning to identify the optimal process parameters such as infill structure and density, material (ABS, PLA, Nylon, PVA, and PETG), wall and layer thickness, count, and temperature. The result thus obtained was used to train a machine learning algorithm. Four different network architectures (CNN, Resnet152, MobileNet, and Inception V3) were used to build the algorithm. The algorithm was able to predict the parameters for a given requirement. It was also able to detect any errors. The algorithm was trained to pause the print immediately in case of a mistake. Upon comparison, it was found that the algorithm built with Inception V3 achieved the best accuracy of 97%. The applications include saving the material from being wasted due to print time errors in the manufacturing industry.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingdesign of experimentsfused filament fabricationmachine learningTaguchi

Identifiers

PMID36557530
PMCPMC9782863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.