ArticleMicromachines2022
Miniature Manipulator Design and Cartesian Control for Minimally Invasive Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a miniature manipulator under Cartesian control for minimally invasive transluminal endoscopic surgery. The manipulator had four degrees of freedom (DoFs) and a diameter of only 3.5 mm. The compact size of the manipulator allowed it to pass through the instrument channel of the endoscope, and its high dexterity allowed it to perform most of the operations in endoscopic surgery such as marking, grasping, hanging, etc. The implicit function relationship in the kinematics of the continuum manipulator was analyzed. By introducing the regression analysis method, the analytical form of the inverse kinematics was obtained. The distribution of singularities in the manipulator workspace was analyzed with emphasis. The presence of singularities made Cartesian mapping control between the primary side and secondary side impossible. By introducing the smoothing method of the joint trajectory, the discontinuity of the joint velocity at the singularity was avoided and the primary-secondary mapping under Cartesian control was realized. The trajectory-tracking experiment proved that the smoothness of the joint trajectory could make the manipulator smoothly pass through the singularity. The fixed-point marking experiment proved that the Cartesian control could improve the intuition of operation and the efficiency of task completion. Comprehensive performance experiments showed that the manipulator had enough dexterity to execute complex operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.