Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557391›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2022

Hemolytic Activity of Nanoparticles as a Marker of Their Hemocompatibility.

Saul Yedgar, Gregory Barshtein, Alexander Gural

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Enhanced anticancer efficacy ofMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Synthesis and Biomedical Potential of TiCOBiological trace element research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of CoFeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saul YedgarDepartment of Biochemistry, The Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Gregory BarshteinDepartment of Biochemistry, The Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6588-7229
Alexander GuralBlood Bank, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential use of nanomaterials in medicine offers opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches to treating complex disorders. For that reason, a new branch of science, named nanotoxicology, which aims to study the dangerous effects of nanomaterials on human health and on the environment, has recently emerged. However, the toxicity and risk associated with nanomaterials are unclear or not completely understood. The development of an adequate experimental strategy for assessing the toxicity of nanomaterials may include a rapid/express method that will reliably, quickly, and cheaply make an initial assessment. One possibility is the characterization of the hemocompatibility of nanomaterials, which includes their hemolytic activity as a marker. In this review, we consider various factors affecting the hemolytic activity of nanomaterials and draw the reader's attention to the fact that the formation of a protein corona around a nanoparticle can significantly change its interaction with the red cell. This leads us to suggest that the nanomaterial hemolytic activity in the buffer does not reflect the situation in the blood plasma. As a recommendation, we propose studying the hemocompatibility of nanomaterials under more physiologically relevant conditions, in the presence of plasma proteins in the medium and under mechanical stress.

Indexed as

hemocompatibilityhemolytic activitynanomaterialsnanoparticlesnanotoxicityred blood cells

Identifiers

PMID36557391
PMCPMC9783501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.