Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557231›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2022

Comparative Study of the Gut Microbiota Community between the Farmed and Wild

Xiongjun Liu, Yuqin Fan, Tao Mo, Qingxiu Chen, Weiting Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificially RearedBiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiongjun LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Precision Utilization of Characteristic Agricultural Resources in Mountainous Area, School of Life Sciences, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China.
Yuqin FanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Precision Utilization of Characteristic Agricultural Resources in Mountainous Area, School of Life Sciences, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China.
Tao MoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Precision Utilization of Characteristic Agricultural Resources in Mountainous Area, School of Life Sciences, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China.
Qingxiu ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Precision Utilization of Characteristic Agricultural Resources in Mountainous Area, School of Life Sciences, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China.
Weiting ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Conservation and Precision Utilization of Characteristic Agricultural Resources in Mountainous Area, School of Life Sciences, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China.
Jiaying University · CN

Funding

Educational Commission of Guangdong Province of China 2021ZDZX4054Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018A030307041Natural Science Program of Jiaying University 2021KJZ02Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2019A0103002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated and wild fish of the same species may exhibit different characteristics, such as in their flavor, growth and development. In some wild fish species, reproductive functions may even be retarded when wild individuals are moved into cultivated conditions. The gut microbiota may be one of the reasons for these phenomena as they have been reported to play an important role in host growth and development, as well as in normal reproductive functioning. Here, we used

Indexed as

16S rRNA sequencingdiversityintestinal floraMastacembelus armatus

Identifiers

PMID36557231
PMCPMC9781078
OpenAlexW4311002969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.