Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557164›Full record

ArticleMembranes2022

Spinning of Polysulfone Hollow Fiber Membranes Using Constant Dope Solution Composition: Viscosity Control via Temperature.

Dmitry Matveev, Ilya Borisov, Vladimir Vasilevsky, Galina Karpacheva, Vladimir Volkov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reclaiming of Amine COMembranes · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dmitry MatveevA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ilya BorisovA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-6280
Vladimir VasilevskyA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Galina KarpachevaA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4582-8226
Vladimir VolkovA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1106-2947

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-19-00647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dope solution viscosity is an important parameter that largely determines the properties of hollow fiber membranes. In the literature available today, the change in viscosity is carried out only by changing the quantitative and/or qualitative dope solution compositions. However, such an important spinning parameter as temperature should significantly affect the dope solution viscosity. For the first time, the influence of the dope solution viscosity of a constant composition on polysulfone hollow fiber membrane properties was studied. The hollow fiber membranes were obtained by the phase separation method induced by a non-solvent (NIPS). The change in the dope solution temperature was carried out in the temperature range of 17-27 °C, providing a dope solution viscosity range of 34.3-21.6 Pa∙s. This work shows that even in such a narrow temperature range, the properties of polysulfone hollow fiber membranes change significantly. With a decrease in the viscosity in this temperature range, the wall thickness of the hollow fiber membrane decreases by 2.8 times; the permeance for the individual gases He and CO

Indexed as

dope solutiongas permeabilityhollow fiber membranephase inversion kineticspolysulfonespinning parameterstemperature controlviscosity effect

Identifiers

PMID36557164
PMCPMC9783959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.