Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557056›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Management of Complex Acetabular Fractures by Using 3D Printed Models.

Stoyan Ivanov, Petar Valchanov, Stoyan Hristov, Deyan Veselinov, Boyko Gueorguiev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stoyan IvanovDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Petar ValchanovDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.
Stoyan HristovDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital for Active Treatment, 8018 Burgas, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6118-315X
Deyan VeselinovBulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Metal Science 'Acad. A. Balevski', 1574 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-7582-4766
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-115X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Using 3D printed models in orthopaedics and traumatology contributes to a better understanding of injury patterns regarding surgical approaches, reduction techniques, and fracture fixation methods. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel technique implementing 3D printed models to facilitate the optimal preoperative planning of the surgical treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex acetabular fractures were assigned to two groups: (1) conventional group (n = 12) and (2) 3D printed group (n = 10). Both groups included participants with either a posterior column plus posterior wall fracture, a transverse plus posterior wall fracture, or a both-column acetabular fracture. Datasets from CT scanning were segmented and converted to STL format, with separated bones and fragments for 3D printing in different colors. Comparison between the two groups was performed in terms of quality of fracture reduction (good: equal to, or less than 2 mm displacement, and fair: larger than 2 mm displacement), functional assessment, operative time, blood loss, and number of intraoperative x-rays. Results: A significant decrease in operative time, blood loss, and number of intraoperative x-rays was registered in the 3D printed group versus the conventional one (p < 0.01), with 80% of the patients in the former having good fracture reduction and 20% having fair reduction. In contrast, 50% of the patients in the conventional group had good reduction and 50% had fair reduction. The functional score at 18-month follow-up was better for patients in the 3D printed group. Conclusions: The 3D printing technique can be considered a highly efficient and patient-specific approach for management of complex acetabular fractures, helping to restore patient′s individual anatomy after surgery.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneHip FracturesSpinal FracturesAcetabulumFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPrinting, Three-DimensionalTreatment Outcome3D printed modelscomplex acetabular fracturesimplant selectionsurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID36557056
PMCPMC9785751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.