Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557022›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Comparative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Po-I Li, Szu-Ju Chen, Yung-Hsiang Chen, Wen-Chi Chen, Chi-Ping Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Po-I LiDepartment of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
Szu-Ju ChenDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Yung-Hsiang ChenGraduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8756-5113
Wen-Chi ChenDepartment of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-1638
Chi-Ping HuangDepartment of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWAsia University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

China Medical University CMU111-MF-54China Medical University Hospital DMR-111-080Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 110-2320-B-039-032Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 111-2320-B-039-022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of radical prostatectomy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer is controversial owing to an increased complication rate and treatment-related morbidity. With technical advances and refinements in surgical techniques, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has improved the outcomes of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. RARP therefore plays a role in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. In this study, we enrolled a total of 76 patients with pathologic stage pT3a, pT3b, pT4, or pN1. All patients were followed from surgery to June 2022, and their characteristics, perioperative outcomes, complications, adjuvant therapies and outcomes were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 69 years, and the initial PSA level was 20.5 (IQR 10.8-31.6) ng/mL. The median operative time was 205 (IQR 182-241) minutes. Sixty-six patients (86.8%) regained continence within 1 year, and the continence rate within 3 years of follow-up was 90.8% (69 patients). The overall survival rate was 100%. Twenty-two patients had BCR, of whom 13 received salvage androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 2 received salvage external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 7 received combined ADT and EBRT. No patient had disease progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer during a median 36 months of follow-up after salvage therapy. Our results suggest that RARP can also decrease tumor burden and allow for accurate and precise pathological staging with the need for subsequent treatment. Therefore, we recommend that RARP represents a well-standardized, safe, and oncologically effective option for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigenlocally advanced prostate canceroutcomerobotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID36557022
PMCPMC9782116
OpenAlexW4312125673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.