ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Fracture Resistance in CAD-CAM Additively Manufactured Occlusal Veneers.Polymers · 2026Article
- Influence of printing orientation and post-curing on optical and surface properties of definitive three-dimensional-printed dental resin with inorganic fillers.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- A Novel Type II Photoinitiator with Self-Supplied Hydrogen for Anti-Creep Crosslinking Polyethylene Film.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Water Absorption of Underwater Products by Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Mechanical Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to 3D Printed and Milled CAD/CAM Provisional Materials: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Effect of Surface Treatments Applied to 3D Printed Permanent Resins on Shear Bond Strength.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Design, Stereolithographic 3D Printing, and Characterization of TPMS Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Literature Review of an Anterior Deprogrammer to Determine the Centric Relation and Presentation of Cases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Importance of Chitosan Coatings in Dentistry.Marine drugs · 2023Review
- Fracture Resistance Comparative Analysis of Milled-Derived vs. 3D-Printed CAD/CAM Materials for Single-Unit Restorations.Polymers · 2023Article
- Article
- CBCT-Based Design of Patient-Specific 3D Bone Grafts for Periodontal Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Intraoral Condylectomy with 3D-Printed Cutting Guide versus with Surgical Navigation: An Accuracy and Effectiveness Comparison.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Mechanical Properties of Three-Dimensional Printed Provisional Resin Materials for Crown and Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Effects of Polishing and Artificial Aging on Mechanical Properties of Dental LT ClearJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Wear behaviour of lithography ceramic manufactured dental zirconia.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- The Influence of Polishing and Artificial Aging on BioMed AmberJournal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
(1) The CAD/CAM technique exploiting 3D printing is becoming more and more popular in dentistry. The resins are used in all the dental specialties, including conservative dentistry, prosthodontics, surgery, and orthodontics. The interest in investigating the different properties of dental materials has been an aim of researchers. The purpose of the presented study was to compare the properties of two 3D-printable dental resins (both rigid, used for medical purposes). (2) Methods: Ten blocks of two-type shapes were printed on a printer designed for medical use. The tensile modulus and compression were investigated and compared. The axial compression test was performed according to the PN-EN ISO 604:2003 norm, while the tensile test was performed according to the PN-En ISO 527-1-2019 (E) norm. In the first test, the sample size of the perpendicular shape was 10 ± 0.2 mm × 10 ± 0.2 mm × 4 ± 0.2 mm and in the second it was 75 mm, the end width 10 mm, and the thickness 2 mm. (3) Results: The statistical analysis based on ANOVA tests showed that all the obtained results were statistically significant. Both of the examined materials had similar properties and were resistant and stable in shape. The tensile modulus and compression tests performed on them gave similar results. They also showed high durability to compression and tensility. (4) Conclusions: Both of the examined materials were durable and rigid materials. BioMed Amber was more resistant to compression, while Dental LT clear was more resistant in the tensility test. Although both resins had similar physical properties, it is still disputable whether the chosen materials could be used interchangeably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.