ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Long-Term Predictors of Hospitalized Reinfarction after an Incident Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of β-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction in patients with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2026Review
- Frequencies and Trends of Myocardial Infarction Symptoms From the Years 1985-2019: A Register-based, Real-world Analysis.CJC open · 2025Article
- Combined prediction value of coronary plaque burden, serum creatinine, MLR and NLR in reinfarction risk after PCI in middle-aged and elderly patients with myocardial infarction.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Effects of the hospital-community-family trinity cardiac rehabilitation on patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized trial.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and first and second time reinfarctions in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, treatment, clinical characteristics, medication and outcome. A further aim was to identify predictors for an increased risk of hospitalized reinfarction. Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 13,276 AMI cases were recorded by a population-based registry in the area of Augsburg, Germany, and were included in this study (11,871 incident events, 1217 cases of first-time reinfarction and 202 cases of second-time reinfarction). Median follow-up time was 5.3 years. For differences in baseline characteristics, Chi-square tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were calculated. To determine factors that are associated with an increased risk of hospitalized reinfarction COX regression models were fitted. Myocardial reinfarctions differ from incident events in some major characteristics such as the frequency of comorbidities, laboratory values, ECG presentation and therapy, but not regarding 28-day mortality. Moreover, typical comorbidities and risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, impaired renal function) are associated with an increased risk of hospitalized reinfarction. Conversely, STEMI ECG, being married, German nationality and bypass surgery are predictors for a lower risk of hospitalized reinfarction. Incident AMI and reinfarction are distinctly different in many characteristics, which physicians should have in mind when treating patients with prior AMI. Typical comorbidities are risk factors for hospitalized reinfarction. This underlines the importance of comprehensive treatment of these comorbidities including education of patients and encouragement towards lifestyle adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.