Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36556290›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Cognitive Impairment after Post-Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Andrea Perrottelli, Noemi Sansone, Giulia Maria Giordano, Edoardo Caporusso, Luigi Giuliani, Antonio Melillo, Pasquale Pezzella, Paola Bucci, Armida Mucci, Silvana Galderisi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Definitions and symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome: an updated systematic umbrella review.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Novel Advancements in COVID-19 and Neuroscience.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Long COVID-19 and mnemonic effects: an integrative literature review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea PerrottelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7771-1845
Noemi SansoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Giulia Maria GiordanoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Edoardo CaporussoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Luigi GiulianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Antonio MelilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Pasquale PezzellaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8442-5385
Paola BucciDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Armida MucciDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-9456
Silvana GalderisiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Largo Madonna delle Grazie, 80138 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to provide a critical overview of the literature on the relationships between post-acute COVID-19 infection and cognitive impairment, highlighting the limitations and confounding factors. A systematic search of articles published from 1 January 2020 to 1 July 2022 was performed in PubMed/Medline. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies using validated instruments for the assessment of cognitive impairment were included. Out of 5515 screened records, 72 studies met the inclusion criteria. The available evidence revealed the presence of impairment in executive functions, speed of processing, attention and memory in subjects recovered from COVID-19. However, several limitations of the literature reviewed should be highlighted: most studies were performed on small samples, not stratified by severity of disease and age, used as a cross-sectional or a short-term longitudinal design and provided a limited assessment of the different cognitive domains. Few studies investigated the neurobiological correlates of cognitive deficits in individuals recovered from COVID-19. Further studies with an adequate methodological design are needed for an in-depth characterization of cognitive impairment in individuals recovered from COVID-19.

Indexed as

attentioncognitioncognitive dysfunctionCOVID-19executive functionslong covidmemorySARS-CoV-2 coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID36556290
PMCPMC9781311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.