Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36556278›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2022

Optimal Prandial Timing of Insulin Bolus in Youths with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Enza Mozzillo, Roberto Franceschi, Francesca Di Candia, Alessia Ricci, Letizia Leonardi, Martina Girardi, Francesco Maria Rosanio, Maria Loredana Marcovecchio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Enza MozzilloDepartment of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Roberto FranceschiPediatric Diabetology Unit, Pediatric Department, Santa Chiara General Hospital of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2230-7148
Francesca Di CandiaDepartment of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Alessia RicciPediatric Diabetology Unit, Pediatric Department, Santa Chiara General Hospital of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Letizia LeonardiPediatric Diabetology Unit, Pediatric Department, Santa Chiara General Hospital of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Martina GirardiPediatric Diabetology Unit, Pediatric Department, Santa Chiara General Hospital of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Francesco Maria RosanioDepartment of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, Regional Center of Pediatric Diabetes, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Maria Loredana MarcovecchioDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4415-316X
Ospedale Santa Chiara · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to report the evidence on optimal prandial timing of insulin bolus in youths with type 1 diabetes. A systematic search was performed including studies published in the last 20 years (2002-2022). A PICOS framework was used in the selection process and evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Up to one third of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes injected rapid-acting insulin analogues after a meal. Moderate-high level quality studies showed that a pre-meal bolus compared with a bolus given at the start or after the meal was associated with a lower peak blood glucose after one to two hours, particularly after breakfast, as well as with reduced HbA1c, without any difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia. There were no differences related to the timing of bolus in total daily insulin and BMI, although these results were based on a single study. Data on individuals' treatment satisfaction were limited but did not show any effect of timing of bolus on quality of life. In addition, post-prandial administration of fast-acting analogues was superior to rapid-acting analogues on post-prandial glycemia. There was no evidence for any difference in outcomes related to the timing of insulin bolus across age groups in the two studies. In conclusion, prandial insulin injected before a meal, particularly at breakfast, provides better post-prandial glycemia and HbA1c without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia, and without affecting total daily insulin dose and BMI. For young children who often have variable eating behaviors, fast-acting analogues administered at mealtime or post-meal could provide an additional advantage.

Indexed as

insulin boluspost-prandial blood glucosetiming

Identifiers

PMID36556278
PMCPMC9781659
OpenAlexW4311366651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.