Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36556219›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

A Historical Misconception in Clinical Trials of Drugs for Cancer-Age Grouping.

Jingyu Chen, Lan Yao, Abdulmohsin J Alamoudi, Lotfi Aleya, Weikuan Gu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jingyu ChenDepartment of Chinese Medicine Internal Medicine, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No. 1, Xiyuan Playground, Haidian District, Beijing 100091, China.
Lan YaoDepartment of Nutrition and Health Science, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA.
Abdulmohsin J AlamoudiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9028-8225
Lotfi AleyaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Weikuan GuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and BME, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1112-8088
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNKing Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

University of Tennessee Health Science Center R073290109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical trials of cancer drugs, grouping by age is a very common grouping method, as it can allow for a visual comparison of the different pharmaceutical responses in patients at different age stages. Under the guidance of this thinking, many researchers use age grouping when studying clinical cancer drugs. However, even people at the same age may be at different stages in their lives, such as individuals who are going through puberty, menopause/andropause, or intermediate transition, as well as childhood and old age, affected by factors such as hormone levels, immune responses, ethnic groups, and regions. Every individual has different cancer symptoms and responses to drugs; therefore, the experimental effect of life stage grouping will be more obvious and clearer. Not only does this conclusion apply to cancer drugs, but it also applies to clinical trials for other diseases. In addition, this does not mean that age grouping should be completely abandoned. Life stage is a more general interval that can be further divided into life stage groups according to the age of the patients. Based on the principal law of lifespan (PLOSP), age trends in life stages also need to be updated from time to time. To date, life stage grouping has not been discussed systematically and has not been used as a grouping method for cancer patients. In this paper, life stage grouping is discussed as one of the important grouping categories in cancer clinical trials.

Indexed as

agecancerclinical triallife stagepatients

Identifiers

PMID36556219
PMCPMC9785466
OpenAlexW4311105736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.