Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36556127›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Operative Re-Intervention following Pancreatoduodenectomy: What Has Changed over the Last Decades.

Jana Enderes, Christiane Pillny, Jens Standop, Steffen Manekeller, Jörg C Kalff, Tim R Glowka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jana EnderesDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8365-3626
Christiane PillnyDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Jens StandopDepartment of Surgery, DRK-Hospital Neuwied, 56564 Neuwied, Germany.
Steffen ManekellerDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6159-4506
Jörg C KalffDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Tim R GlowkaDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6996-9766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To investigate changes over the last decades in the management of postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with special emphasis on reoperations, their indications, and outcomes. Methods: 409 patients who underwent PD between 2008 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to their need for reoperations (reoperation, n = 81, 19.8% vs. no reoperation, n = 328, 80.2%). The cohort was then compared to a second cohort comprising patients who underwent PD between 1989 and 2007 (n = 285). Results: 81 patients (19.8%) underwent reoperation. The main cause of reoperation was the dehiscence of pancreatogastrostomy (22.2%). Reoperation was associated with a longer duration of the index operation, more blood loss, and more erythrocyte concentrates being transfused. Patients who underwent reoperation showed more postoperative complications and a higher mortality rate (25% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). Compared to the earlier cohort, the observed increase in reoperations did not lead to increased mortality (5% vs. 6%, p = 353). Conclusions: The main cause for reoperation has changed over the last decades and was the dehiscence of pancreatogastrostomy. Associated with a leakage of pancreatic fluid and clinically relevant PF, it remains the most devastating complication following PD. Strategies for prevention and treatment, e.g., by endoscopic vacuum-assisted-closure therapy are of utmost importance.

Indexed as

operative reinterventionpancreatic fistulapancreatoduodenectomyredo surgeryreoperationwhipple

Identifiers

PMID36556127
PMCPMC9782126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.