ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation and Microplegia in the Setting of Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Cardiac Troponin T and I: Impact on Definitions of Perioperative Myocardial Infarction After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Conservative fluid resuscitation protocol does not reduce the incidence of reoperation for bleeding after emergency CABG.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to analyse the performance of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) concomitantly with Microplegia, in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods: We included patients with a recent MI (≤7 days) undergoing isolated CABG surgery using MiECC. The primary endpoint was a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event (MACCE). In a secondary analysis, we compared our institutional Microplegia concept with the use of a crystalloid single-shot cardioplegic solution. Results: In total, 139 patients (mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 66 ± 10 years) underwent urgent CABG surgery using Microplegia; 55% (n = 77) of the patients had an acute MI within 1−7 days preoperatively; 20% (n = 28) had an acute MI within 6−24 h; and 24% (n = 34) had an acute MI within <6 h preoperatively. The number of distal anastomoses was a geometric mean of 4 (95% confidence interval 3−4). The MACCE and in-hospital mortality were 7% (n = 10) and 1% (n = 2), respectively. The results were confirmed in a secondary analysis comparing Microplegia with crystalloid cardioplegic solution (n = 271). Conclusion: The use of MiECC with Microplegia in urgent CABG surgery is feasible and safe and provides a straight-forward intraoperative setting. Therefore, it can also be considered to retain the benefits of MiECC in urgent CABG surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.