Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36556038›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Single-Stage Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Preoperative Planning, Surgical Technique, and Mixed Reality Execution.

Kristine Italia, Marine Launay, Luke Gilliland, James Nielsen, Roberto Pareyon, Freek Hollman, Asma Salhi, Jashint Maharaj, Mohammad Jomaa, Kenneth Cutbush and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristine ItaliaQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-3197
Marine LaunayQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Luke GillilandQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5433-9403
James NielsenQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Roberto PareyonQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Freek HollmanQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Asma SalhiQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0207-3188
Jashint MaharajQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Mohammad JomaaQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-2304
Kenneth CutbushQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Ashish GuptaQueensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revision shoulder arthroplasty is increasing with the number of primary shoulder replacements rising globally. Complex primary and revisions of shoulder arthroplasties pose specific challenges for the surgeon, which must be addressed preoperatively and intraoperatively. This article aimed to present strategies for the management of revision of shoulder arthroplasties through a single-stage approach. Preoperatively, patient factors, such as age, comorbidities, and bone quality, should be considered. The use of planning software can aid in accurately evaluating implants in situ and predict bony anatomy that will remain after explantation during the revision surgery. The planning from such software can then be executed with the help of mixed reality technology to allow accurate implant placement. Single-stage revision is performed in two steps (debridement as first step, implantation and reconstruction as the second step), guided by the following principles: adequate debridement while preserving key soft tissue attachments (i.e., rotator cuff, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, deltoid), restoration of glenoid joint line using bone grafting, restoration of humeral length, reconstruction and/or reattachment of soft tissues, and strict compliance with the postoperative antibiotic regimen. Preliminary results of single-stage revision shoulder arthroplasty show improvement in patient outcomes (mean 1 year), successful treatment of infection for those diagnosed with periprosthetic joint infection, and improved cost-benefit parameters for the healthcare system.

Indexed as

mixed realitypreoperative planningshoulder arthroplastysingle-stage revision

Identifiers

PMID36556038
PMCPMC9788296
OpenAlexW4311794140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.