ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Routine neutral glenoid version targets in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Time for a patient-specific, fixation-oriented approach.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Variability in preoperative planning software for shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2026Article
- Effect of combined version on impingement-free rotational range-of-motion in three different implant types in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2026Article
- Accuracy of implant placement after preoperative planning using Blueprint software in inlay and onlay reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems: a cadaver study.Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2026Article
- Glenoid baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Clinical accuracy of humeral and glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty using ASTRA patient-specific guides.JSES international · 2025Article
- Distance of the radial nerve from distal interlocking screws in long-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric analysis.JSES international · 2025Article
- Increased glenoid baseplate retroversion improves internal rotation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional planning, navigation, patient-specific instrumentation and mixed reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a digital orthopedic renaissance.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Mid-term results of the use of structural humeral head autograft to correct glenoid bone loss in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2024Article
- Influence of Lateralization and Distalization on Joint Function after Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing interest in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) as a reliable treatment for arthritic, rotator cuff deficient shoulders. Humeral and glenoid version are controversial parameters that can influence internal and external rotation, muscular forces, and implant stability as outcomes of RTSA. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the current knowledge on the effect of both humeral component version and glenoid component version and give recommendations on their most optimal degree for RTSA. A comprehensive quantitative review of the published literature on the effect of humeral version and glenoid version in RTSA was performed, to identify its influence on the range of movement, muscle forces, and intrinsic stability of the reverse prosthesis. Eleven studies were included: nine were biomechanical studies, one was a clinical-radiographic study, and one was an implant design consideration. Anterior stability can be improved by implanting the humeral component in neutral or with some anteversion. Glenoid component retroversion has been proven to reduce the likelihood of subluxation, while increasing ER and ROM at the same time. The study was conducted considering 5° anteversion; neutral; and 5°, 10°, and 20° retroversion of the glenoid component. Although a final opinion has not been yet expressed on the matter, the general consensus tends to agree on restoring 0° to 20° of retroversion of the humeral and glenoid component to yield the best outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.