Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555990›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Comparative Visual Outcome Analysis of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens and a New Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus.

Majid Moshirfar, Seth R Stapley, Wyatt M Corbin, Nour Bundogji, Matthew Conley, Ines M Darquea, Yasmyne C Ronquillo, Phillip C Hoopes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Editorial: Insights in glaucoma: 2023.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Majid MoshirfarHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-6250
Seth R StapleyArizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2545-9312
Wyatt M CorbinStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60153, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0318-0903
Nour BundogjiJohn A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-080X
Matthew ConleySchool of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Ines M DarqueaHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.
Yasmyne C RonquilloHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-4380
Phillip C HoopesHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT 84020, USA.

Funding

Research to Prevent Blindness N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares the visual and refractive performance of the TECNIS Synergy (DFR00V-DFW150-225-300-375) multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and the AcrySof IQ PanOptix (TFAT00-30-40-50-60) multifocal IOL. Patients who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received either a multifocal Synergy or PanOptix IOL were included. Monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), near (UNVA), and corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuities were assessed at three and six months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures of photic phenomena were also assessed. A total of 140 patients (224 eyes) were included in this study, with 69 patients (105 eyes) in the Synergy group and 71 patients (119 eyes) in the PanOptix group. There were no statistically significant differences in UIVA or CDVA measurements across all time points. When assessing UDVA, at three months postoperatively, there were more eyes in the PanOptix group with vision better than 20/40 (

Indexed as

cataractextended depth-of-focus (EDOF)glarehaloIOLmultifocal IOLPanOptixphotic phenomenarefractive outcomesSymfonySynergyvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID36555990
PMCPMC9781237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.