Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555961›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Children and Adolescents-Opportunities and Limitations of the ESIN Technique.

Miriam Kalbitz, Andreas Fischer, Birte Weber, Benjamin Mayer, Ina Lackner, Jochen Pressmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miriam KalbitzDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-0785
Andreas FischerDepartment of Traumatology, Hand-, Plastic- and Reconstructive Surgery, Center of Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Birte WeberDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University of Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Benjamin MayerInstitute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1042-9006
Ina LacknerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Jochen PressmarDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the gold standard for non-overweight children aged 6−12 years. However, the complication rate using elastic stable intramedullary nailing is considerably high. Nevertheless, the question arises of whether the indication for elastic stable intramedullary nailing therapy can be extended and which factors must be taken into account when determining the indication. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients <18 years admitted with diaphyseal femur fracture at a Level I Trauma Center in Germany between 2005 and 2017 was performed. In total, 118 patients were included. For the classification of femur fractures in children, the AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long-Bone Fractures (AO-PCCF) was applied. Results: Simple oblique fractures (32-D/5.1) occurred in most of the patients. Patients with simple oblique fractures were significantly younger compared to patients with simple transverse (32-D/4.1) or multifragmentary (32-D/5.2) fracture type according to the AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long-Bone Fractures. Most patients were treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (68 patients, 58%). Although children treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing were older than those treated conservatively (25%, n = 29, mean age 1.5, median age 1.0), the children in the elastic stable intramedullary nailing group were comparatively young (range 1−12 years, mean age 5.4, median age 5). A total of 32 children below the age of 6 years were treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing. Complications were more frequent in patients with overhead extension (50%) compared to conservative treatment with a spica cast (17%) or elastic stable intramedullary nailing (15%). Conclusions: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing therapy was associated with a low complication rate and was, therefore, a safe and frequently used treatment strategy in diaphyseal femur fractures with satisfactory results, even though the age groups were expanded in favor of younger patients.

Indexed as

adolescentAO-PCCFchilddiaphyseal femur fractureESIN

Identifiers

PMID36555961
PMCPMC9784624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.