Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555950›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Application of nnU-Net for Automatic Segmentation of Lung Lesions on CT Images and Its Implication for Radiomic Models.

Matteo Ferrante, Lisa Rinaldi, Francesca Botta, Xiaobin Hu, Andreas Dolp, Marta Minotti, Francesca De Piano, Gianluigi Funicelli, Stefania Volpe, Federica Bellerba and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Matteo FerranteMedical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-0832
Lisa RinaldiRadiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-0849
Francesca BottaMedical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3693-8899
Xiaobin HuDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Andreas DolpDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Marta MinottiDivision of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Francesca De PianoDivision of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Gianluigi FunicelliDivision of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Stefania VolpeDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Federica BellerbaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5956-4340
Paolo De MarcoMedical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Sara RaimondiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-9049
Stefania RizzoClinica di Radiologia EOC, Istituto Imaging della Svizzera Italiana (IIMSI), via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5151-0866
Kuangyu ShiChair for Computer-Aided Medical Procedures, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstraße 21, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Marta CremonesiRadiation Research Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Barbara A Jereczek-FossaDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo SpaggiariDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Filippo De MarinisDivision of Thoracic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Roberto OrecchiaDivision of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Daniela OriggiMedical Physics Unit, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.

Funding

IEO Foundation Radiomic projectItalian Ministry of Health GR-2016-02362050Italian Ministry of Health Progetto di EccellenzaItalian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente and 5x1000 fundings
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics investigates the predictive role of quantitative parameters calculated from radiological images. In oncology, tumour segmentation constitutes a crucial step of the radiomic workflow. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. In this study, a state-of-the-art deep-learning network for automatic segmentation (nnU-Net) was applied to computed tomography images of lung tumour patients, and its impact on the performance of survival radiomic models was assessed. In total, 899 patients were included, from two proprietary and one public datasets. Different network architectures (2D, 3D) were trained and tested on different combinations of the datasets. Automatic segmentations were compared to reference manual segmentations performed by physicians using the DICE similarity coefficient. Subsequently, the accuracy of radiomic models for survival classification based on either manual or automatic segmentations were compared, considering both hand-crafted and deep-learning features. The best agreement between automatic and manual contours (DICE = 0.78 ± 0.12) was achieved averaging 2D and 3D predictions and applying customised post-processing. The accuracy of the survival classifier (ranging between 0.65 and 0.78) was not statistically different when using manual versus automatic contours, both with hand-crafted and deep features. These results support the promising role nnU-Net can play in automatic segmentation, accelerating the radiomic workflow without impairing the models' accuracy. Further investigations on different clinical endpoints and populations are encouraged to confirm and generalise these findings.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationhand-crafted/deep featuresnnU-NetNSCLCpredictive modelradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36555950
PMCPMC9784875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.