Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555937›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Opioid Dose, Pain, and Recovery following Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Dongxu Chen, Xiaoqing Li, Yu Chen, Huolin Zeng, Jin Liu, Qian Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dongxu ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Rd., Chengdu 610041, China.
Xiaoqing LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Rd., Chengdu 610041, China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 18, Sect. 3 People South Road, Chengdu 610041, China.
Huolin ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Rd., Chengdu 610041, China.
Jin LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Rd., Chengdu 610041, China.
Qian LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainan Guoxue Rd., Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNFourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal dosage for opioids given to patients after surgery for pain management remains controversial. We examined the association of higher post-surgical opioid use with pain relief and recovery. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled adult patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery at our hospital between August 2021 and April 2022. Patients were divided into the “high-intensity” or “low-intensity” groups based on their post-surgical opioid use. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess the associations between pain scores at rest and during movement on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 after surgery as primary outcomes. The self-reported recovery and incidence of adverse events were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Results: Among the 1170 patients in the final analysis, 293 were in the high-intensity group. Patients in the high-intensity group received nearly double the amount of oral morphine equivalents per day compared to those in the low-intensity group (84.52 vs. 43.80), with a mean difference of 40.72 (95% confidence interval (CI0 38.96−42.48, p < 0.001) oral morphine equivalents per day. At all timepoints, the high-intensity group reported significantly higher pain scores at rest (difference in means 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.58; p < 0.001) and during movement (difference in means 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71; p < 0.001) as well as significantly lower recovery scores (mean difference (MD) −8.65; 95% CI, −10.55 to −6.67; p < 0.001). A post hoc analysis found that patients with moderate to severe pain during movement were more likely to receive postoperative high-intensity opioid use. Furthermore, patients in the non-high-intensity group got out of bed sooner (MD 4.31 h; p = 0.001), required urine catheters for shorter periods of time (MD 12.26 h; p < 0.001), and were hospitalized for shorter periods (MD 1.17 days; p < 0.001). The high-intensity group was at a higher risk of chronic postsurgical pain (odds ratio 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.08, p = 0.005). Conclusions: High-intensity opioid use after elective abdominal surgery may not be sufficient for improving pain management or the quality of recovery compared to non-high-intensity use. Our results strengthen the argument for a multimodal approach that does not rely so heavily on opioids.

Indexed as

acute painopioid utilizationpain reliefquality of recovery

Identifiers

PMID36555937
PMCPMC9781588
OpenAlexW4311974327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.