ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022
Microbial Biomarkers for Lung Cancer: Current Understandings and Limitations.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratumoral microbiota in the growth of CRC and lung cancer: Comprehensive insights from etiology to therapy.iScience · 2026Review
- Article
- Bronchoalveolar lavage microbiota signatures and stage-associated alterations in early-stage and advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Culturable and unculturable periodontal microorganisms in non-small cell lung cancer: an exploratory analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the characteristics of gut microbiota in the development and progression of early-stage colorectal cancer based on metagenomic sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Lung cancer and the Gut-microbiota-lung Axis: emerging evidence and potential clinical implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Microbes for lung cancer detection: feasibility and limitations.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The human microbiome and cancer: a diagnostic and therapeutic perspective.Cancer biology & therapy · 2023Review
- The Complex Role of the Microbiome in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Development and Progression.Cells · 2023Review
- Intracellular bacteria in cancer-prospects and debates.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Review
- Short-chain fatty acids in cancer pathogenesis.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As our "hidden organ", microbes widely co-exist at various sites on the human body. These microbes are collectively referred to as the microbiome. A considerable number of studies have already proven that the microbiome has significant impacts on human health and disease progression, including cancers. The recent discovery of cancer-specific microbiomes renders these cancer-associated microbes as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. While at low biomass levels, the lung microbiome still dramatically influences the initiation, progression and treatment of lung cancers. However, research on lung cancer-associated microbiomes is emerging, and most profiling studies are performed within three years. Unfortunately, there are substantial inconsistencies across these studies. Variations in microbial diversity were observed, and different microbial biomarkers for lung cancer have been proposed. In this review, we summarized the current findings of lung cancer microbiome studies and attempt to explain the potential reasons for the dissimilarities. Other than lung microbiomes, oral and airway microbiomes are highly related to lung microbiomes and are therefore included as well. In addition, several lung cancer-associated bacterial genera have been detected by different independent studies. These bacterial genera may not be perfect biomarkers, but they still serve as promising risk factors for lung cancers and show great prognostic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.