Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555728›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

iPSC-Derived Macrophages: The Differentiation Protocol Affects Cell Immune Characteristics and Differentiation Trajectories.

Anna Klepikova, Tatiana Nenasheva, Olga Sheveleva, Elena Protasova, Daniil Antonov, Anastasiia Gainullina, Evgeniia Chikina, Olga Sakovnich, Tatiana Gerasimova, Irina Nikitina and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Decoding Pain: Next-Generation In Vitro Systems for Mechanistic Insights and Drug Discovery.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna KlepikovaGenomics Core Facility, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Boulevard 30, Bld. 1, 121205 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-2170
Tatiana NenashevaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1669-5244
Olga ShevelevaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Elena ProtasovaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3457-4526
Daniil AntonovLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasiia GainullinaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3796-2337
Evgeniia ChikinaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Olga SakovnichLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana GerasimovaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-4561
Irina NikitinaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry ShevalieLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Irina LyadovaLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Basis of Histogenesis, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 26, 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3147-5386
Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology · RUSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-75-20176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of human macrophages from induced pluripotent stem cells (iMacs) is a rapidly developing approach used to create disease models, screen drugs, study macrophage-pathogen interactions and develop macrophage-based cell therapy. To generate iMacs, different types of protocols have been suggested, all thought to result in the generation of similar iMac populations. However, direct comparison of iMacs generated using different protocols has not been performed. We have compared the productivity, the differentiation trajectories and the characteristics of iMacs generated using two widely used protocols: one based on the formation of embryoid bodies and the induction of myeloid differentiation by only two cytokines, interleukin-3 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and the other utilizing multiple exogenous factors for iMac generation. We report inter-protocol differences in the following: (i) protocol productivity; (ii) dynamic changes in the expression of genes related to inflammation and lipid homeostasis following iMac differentiation and (iii) the transcriptomic profiles of terminally differentiated iMacs, including the expression of genes involved in inflammatory response, antigen presentation and lipid homeostasis. The results document the dependence of fine iMac characteristics on the type of differentiation protocol, which is important for further development of the field, including the development of iMac-based cell therapy.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansLipidsMacrophagesLipidsantigen presentationinduced pluripotent stem cellsinflammatory responselipid homeostasismacrophage differentiationmacrophages derived from induced pluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID36555728
PMCPMC9781144
OpenAlexW4312195109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.