Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555613›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

The Challenges of O

Valentina Marassi, Stefano Giordani, Andjela Kurevija, Emilio Panetta, Barbara Roda, Nan Zhang, Andrea Azzolini, Sara Dolzani, Dmytro Manko, Pierluigi Reschiglian and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentina MarassiDepartment of Chemistry G. Ciamician, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8742-3708
Stefano GiordaniDepartment of Chemistry G. Ciamician, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Andjela KurevijaAferetica srl, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Emilio PanettaAferetica srl, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Barbara RodaDepartment of Chemistry G. Ciamician, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1060-2921
Nan ZhangDepartment of Chemistry G. Ciamician, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6768-8642
Andrea AzzoliniDinamica Generale S.p.A., 46025 Poggio Rusco, Italy.
Sara DolzaniDinamica Generale S.p.A., 46025 Poggio Rusco, Italy.
Dmytro MankoDinamica Generale S.p.A., 46025 Poggio Rusco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-2952
Pierluigi ReschiglianDepartment of Chemistry G. Ciamician, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Mauro AttiAferetica srl, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Andrea ZattoniDepartment of Chemistry G. Ciamician, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6971-5360
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen (DO) is deeply involved in preserving the life of cellular tissues and human beings due to its key role in cellular metabolism: its alterations may reflect important pathophysiological conditions. DO levels are measured to identify pathological conditions, explain pathophysiological mechanisms, and monitor the efficacy of therapeutic approaches. This is particularly relevant when the measurements are performed in vivo but also in contexts where a variety of biological and synthetic media are used, such as ex vivo organ perfusion. A reliable measurement of medium oxygenation ensures a high-quality process. It is crucial to provide a high-accuracy, real-time method for DO quantification, which could be robust towards different medium compositions and temperatures. In fact, biological fluids and synthetic clinical fluids represent a challenging environment where DO interacts with various compounds and can change continuously and dynamically, and further precaution is needed to obtain reliable results. This study aims to present and discuss the main oxygen detection and quantification methods, focusing on the technical needs for their translation to clinical practice. Firstly, we resumed all the main methodologies and advancements concerning dissolved oxygen determination. After identifying the main groups of all the available techniques for DO sensing based on their mechanisms and applicability, we focused on transferring the most promising approaches to a clinical in vivo/ex vivo setting.

Indexed as

OxygenOxygen ConsumptionHumansOxygenabsolute and relative techniquesbiological fluidsclinical applicationsdissolved oxygen quantificationoxygen sensingtechnical innovation in clinics

Identifiers

PMID36555613
PMCPMC9786805
OpenAlexW4311604212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.