Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555505›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

A Decade of CRISPR-Cas Gnome Editing in

Hyun-Min Kim, Yebin Hong, Jiani Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Aberrant X chromosome dosage compensation causes hybrid male inviability inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Nematode mind: exploring the role of the RNA interference pathway in learning, memory and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A dominantmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyun-Min KimDivision of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4610-3606
Yebin HongDivision of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China.
Jiani ChenDivision of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972876Synear and Wang-Cai grant of Duke Kunshan University HMK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas allows us to introduce desired genome editing, including mutations, epitopes, and deletions, with unprecedented efficiency. The development of CRISPR-Cas has progressed to such an extent that it is now applicable in various fields, with the help of model organisms.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCRISPR-Cas SystemsAnimalsGene EditingGenomeMutationCasC. elegansCRISPRgenome editinggenome engineering

Identifiers

PMID36555505
PMCPMC9781986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.