Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555324›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment.

Bogdan Costăchescu, Adelina-Gabriela Niculescu, Bogdan Florin Iliescu, Marius Gabriel Dabija, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu, Daniel Rotariu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient experiences of tissue donation and digital consent support in primary craniospinal tumour research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Anxiety and depression 1-year after spinal tumour surgery: a retrospective analysis of psychological and clinical predictors.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bogdan Costăchescu"Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Adelina-Gabriela NiculescuResearch Institute of the University of Bucharest-ICUB, University of Bucharest, 050657 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-504X
Bogdan Florin Iliescu"Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-4083
Marius Gabriel Dabija"Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Alexandru Mihai GrumezescuResearch Institute of the University of Bucharest-ICUB, University of Bucharest, 050657 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-094X
Daniel Rotariu"Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROUniversity of Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spine tumors represent a significant social and medical problem, affecting the quality of life of thousands of patients and imposing a burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Encompassing a wide range of diseases, spine tumors require prompt multidisciplinary treatment strategies, being mainly approached through chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions, either alone or in various combinations. However, these conventional tactics exhibit a series of drawbacks (e.g., multidrug resistance, tumor recurrence, systemic adverse effects, invasiveness, formation of large bone defects) which limit their application and efficacy. Therefore, recent research focused on finding better treatment alternatives by utilizing modern technologies to overcome the challenges associated with conventional treatments. In this context, the present paper aims to describe the types of spine tumors and the most common current treatment alternatives, further detailing the recent developments in anticancer nanoformulations, personalized implants, and enhanced surgical techniques.

Indexed as

Spinal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeSpinecustom-made implantsinterdisciplinary therapeutic approachesprimary spinal tumorsspinal metastasesspine tumor treatmenttumor-targeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID36555324
PMCPMC9779730
OpenAlexW4312123284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.