Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555306›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

A Predictive Pharmacokinetic Model for Immune Cell-Mediated Uptake and Retention of Nanoparticles in Tumors.

Ailton Sousa-Junior, Chun-Ting Yang, Preethi Korangath, Robert Ivkov, Andris Bakuzis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ailton Sousa-JuniorInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8216-2043
Chun-Ting YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7667-244X
Preethi KorangathDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Robert IvkovDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Andris BakuzisInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3366-106X

Funding

Translational Application of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy with Adjuvant Therapies for GlioblastomaR01CA247290 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HADJIPANAYIS, CONSTANTINOS GEORGE, IVKOV, ROBERT · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Enhancing Liver Cancer Treatment With Image-Guided Magnetic HyperthermiaR01CA194574 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI IVKOV, ROBERT · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
Precision magnetic hyperthermia by integrating magnetic particle imagingR01CA257557 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BULTE, JEFF W., IVKOV, ROBERT · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194574NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247290NCI NIH HHS R01CA247290NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A promise of cancer nanomedicine is the "targeted" delivery of therapeutic agents to tumors by the rational design of nanostructured materials. During the past several decades, a realization that in vitro and in vivo preclinical data are unreliable predictors of successful clinical translation has motivated a reexamination of this approach. Mathematical models of drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution (BD) are essential tools for small-molecule drugs development. A key assumption underlying these models is that drug-target binding kinetics dominate blood clearance, hence recognition by host innate immune cells is not explicitly included. Nanoparticles circulating in the blood are conspicuous to phagocytes, and inevitable interactions typically trigger active biological responses to sequester and remove them from circulation. Our recent findings suggest that, instead of referring to nanoparticles as designed for active or passive "tumor targeting", we ought rather to refer to immune cells residing in the tumor microenvironment (TME) as active or passive actors in an essentially "cell-mediated tumor retention" process that competes with active removal by other phagocytes. Indeed, following intravenous injection, nanoparticles induce changes in the immune compartment of the TME because of nanoparticle uptake, irrespective of the nature of tumor targeting moieties. In this study, we propose a 6-compartment PK model as an initial mathematical framework for modeling this tumor-associated immune cell-mediated retention. Published in vivo PK and BD results obtained with bionized nanoferrite

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNanostructuresNeoplasmsAnimalsMacrophagesMiceTissue DistributionTumor Microenvironmentcancer nanomedicineimmune cell interactionsiron oxide nanoparticlesmacrophagestargeted deliverytumor microenvironmenttumor targeting

Identifiers

PMID36555306
PMCPMC9779081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.