Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36555286›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Inhibition of JAK1,2 Prevents Fibrotic Remodeling of Pulmonary Vascular Bed and Improves Outcomes in the Rat Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Andrei A Karpov, Aleksandra M Mihailova, Leonid A Shilenko, Dariya D Vaulina, Elizaveta E Sidorova, Anna A Akhmetova, Pavel M Docshin, Alexander S Krasichkov, Kseniia E Sanarova, Olga M Moiseeva and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Animal models of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrei A KarpovInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Aleksandra M MihailovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Leonid A ShilenkoInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-9419
Dariya D VaulinaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-2396
Elizaveta E SidorovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anna A AkhmetovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Pavel M DocshinInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0182-009X
Alexander S KrasichkovDepartments of Radio Engineering Systems, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University 'LETI', 197022 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Kseniia E SanarovaDepartments of Radio Engineering Systems, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University 'LETI', 197022 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Olga M MoiseevaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7817-3847
Michael M GalagudzaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre · RUSaint Petersburg State Electrotechnical University · RUFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RU

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation 075-00761-22-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism with poor clinical outcomes. Therapeutic approaches to prevention of fibrotic remodeling of the pulmonary vascular bed in CTEPH are limited. In this work, we tested the hypothesis that Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibition with ruxolitinib might prevent and attenuate CTEPH in a rat model. CTEPH was induced by repeated embolization of the pulmonary artery with partially biodegradable 180 ± 30 μm alginate microspheres. Two weeks after the last injection of microspheres, ruxolitinib was administered orally at doses of 0.86, 2.58, and 4.28 mg/kg per day for 4 weeks. Prednisolone (1.475 mg/kg, i.m.) was used as a reference drug. Ruxolitinib in all doses as well as prednisolone reduced pulmonary vascular wall hypertrophy. Ruxolitinib at a dose of 2.58 mg/kg and prednisolone reduced vascular wall fibrosis. Prednisolone treatment resulted in decreased right ventricular systolic pressure. Pulmonary vascular resistance was lower in the prednisolone and ruxolitinib (4.28 mg/kg) groups in comparison with the placebo group. The plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide was lower in groups receiving ruxolitinib at doses of 2.58 and 4.28 mg/kg versus placebo. This study demonstrated that JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib dose-dependently reduced pulmonary vascular remodeling, thereby preventing CTEPH formation in rats.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryAnimalsChronic DiseaseJanus Kinase 1LungNitrilesPulmonary ArteryPyrazolesPyrimidinesRatsJanus Kinase 1NitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibchronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)JAK-STAT pathwaymicrospheresrodent modelruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID36555286
PMCPMC9779027
OpenAlexW4312123472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.