Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554983›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Client Views of Contingency Management in Gambling Treatment: A Thematic Analysis.

Lucy Dorey, Jack McGarrigle, Richard May, Alice E Hoon, Simon Dymond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Contingency Management for Dually Diagnosed Inpatients with Psychosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucy DoreySchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Jack McGarrigleSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Richard MaySchool of Psychology and Therapeutic Studies, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.
Alice E HoonSwansea University Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-6156
Simon DymondSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1319-4492
Swansea University · GBReykjavík University · ISUniversity of South Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low levels of treatment access and poor retention among those with gambling problems suggests a need to improve treatment. Contingency management (CM) is a behavioural intervention involving the identification of target behaviours and the provision of incentives when targets are met. There exists a substantial evidence base for CM increasing abstinence and attendance in substance misuse treatment, but this has not been widely extended to gambling treatment setting. This study sought to explore the views of clients about CM for the treatment of problematic and disordered gambling. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 gambling treatment clients who were, or had previously been, engaged in treatment in Great Britain. Participants were provided with an explanation of CM, two hypothetical scenarios, and two structured questionnaires to facilitate discussion. Thematic analysis was used to interpret findings. Some participants felt that clients could manipulate CM while in treatment to obtain money to gamble, and that mechanisms of CM could trigger recovering clients into relapse. Participants also identified potential benefits of CM to achieve treatment goals, by enhancing motivation and engagement while in treatment, and helping bring people into treatment earlier. Gambling treatment clients broadly supported the use of incentives for treatment. CM is seen as a facilitator of extended engagement in treatment, and an encouragement for clients to make progress in the treatment process.

Indexed as

GamblingBehavior TherapyHumansMotivationRecurrenceUnited Kingdomcontingency managementgamblingqualitativethematic analysistreatment

Identifiers

PMID36554983
PMCPMC9778966
OpenAlexW4311951869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.