Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554901›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Responding to COVID-19: The Suitability of Primary Care Infrastructure in 33 Countries.

Adam Windak, Katarzyna Nessler, Esther Van Poel, Claire Collins, Ewa Wójtowicz, Liubove Murauskiene, Kathryn Hoffmann, Sara Willems

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Health Service Management and Patient Safety in Primary Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Kosovo.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam WindakDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-061 Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna NesslerDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-061 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-7923
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8470-9214
Claire CollinsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-5159
Ewa WójtowiczDepartment of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-061 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5991-0047
Liubove MurauskienePublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-8843
Kathryn HoffmannUnit Health Services Research and Telemedicine in Primary Care, Department of Preventive- and Social Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Wien, Austria.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-7785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 proved that primary care (PC) providers have an important role in managing health emergencies, such as epidemics. Little is known about the preparedness of primary care practice infrastructure to continue providing high quality care during this crisis. The aim of this paper is to describe the perceived limitations to the infrastructure of PC practices during COVID-19 and to determine the factors associated with a higher likelihood of infrastructural barriers in providing high quality care. This paper presents the results of an online survey conducted between November 2020 and November 2021 as a part of PRICOV-19 study. Data from 4974 practices in 33 countries regarding perceived limitations and intentions to make future adjustments to practice infrastructure as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic were collected. Approximately 58% of practices experienced limitations to the building or other practice infrastructure to provide high-quality and safe care during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in 54% making adjustments to the building or the infrastructure was considered. Large variations between the countries were found. The results show that infrastructure constraints were directly proportional to the size of the practice. Better pandemic infection control equipment, governmental support, and a fee-for-service payment system were found to be associated with a lower perceived need for infrastructural changes. The results of the study indicate the need for systematic support for the development of practice infrastructure in order to provide high-quality, safe primary care in the event of future crises similar to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 pandemicgeneral practiceinfection prevention and controlinfrastructurepandemic preparednesspatient safetyPRICOV-19primary care/family medicinequality of care

Identifiers

PMID36554901
PMCPMC9779330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.