Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Forewarned Is Forearmed: Machine Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Catheter-Induced Coronary and Aortic Injuries.

Jacek Klaudel, Barbara Klaudel, Michał Glaza, Wojciech Trenkner, Paweł Derejko, Marek Szołkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacek KlaudelDepartment of Invasive Cardiology and Interventional Radiology, St. Adalbert's Hospital, Copernicus PL, 80-462 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0406-7240
Barbara KlaudelDepartment of Decision Systems and Robotics, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2422-3666
Michał GlazaDepartment of Cardiology, St. Vincent de Paul Hospital, Pomeranian Hospitals, 81-348 Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1103-2943
Wojciech TrenknerDepartment of Invasive Cardiology and Interventional Radiology, St. Adalbert's Hospital, Copernicus PL, 80-462 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1724-8892
Paweł DerejkoDepartment of Cardiology, Medicover Hospital, 02-972 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3317-1837
Marek SzołkiewiczDepartment of Cardiology, St. Vincent de Paul Hospital, Pomeranian Hospitals, 81-348 Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-4014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-induced dissections (CID) of coronary arteries and/or the aorta are among the most dangerous complications of percutaneous coronary procedures, yet the data on their risk factors are anecdotal. Logistic regression and five more advanced machine learning techniques were applied to determine the most significant predictors of dissection. Model performance comparison and feature importance ranking were evaluated. We identified 124 cases of CID in electronic databases containing 84,223 records of diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures from the years 2000-2022. Based on the f1-score, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was found to have the optimal balance between positive predictive value (precision) and sensitivity (recall). As by the XGBoost, the strongest predictors were the use of a guiding catheter (angioplasty), small/stenotic ostium, radial access, hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, prior angioplasty, female gender, chronic renal failure, atypical coronary origin, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Risk prediction can be bolstered with machine learning algorithms and provide valuable clinical decision support. Based on the proposed model, a profile of 'a perfect dissection candidate' can be defined. In patients with 'a clustering' of dissection predictors, a less aggressive catheter and/or modification of the access site should be considered.

Indexed as

AortaPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAlgorithmsCathetersFemaleHumansMachine Learningaortocoronary dissectioncatheter-induced dissectioncoronary artery dissectiondissection predictorsiatrogenic complicationsmachine-learning

Identifiers

PMID36554883
PMCPMC9779019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.