Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554789›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Impact of COVID-19 on the Environments of Professional Nursing Practice and Nurses' Job Satisfaction.

Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro, Vânia Maria Oliveira Coimbra, Soraia Cristina de Abreu Pereira, Ana da Conceição Alves Faria, Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral Teles, Carla Gomes da Rocha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nurses' perspectives on nurses' work methods.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes RibeiroNursing School of Porto (ESEP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9982-9537
Vânia Maria Oliveira CoimbraNorth Region Health Administration, 4000-447 Porto, Portugal.
Soraia Cristina de Abreu PereiraNorth Region Health Administration, 4000-447 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8011-378X
Ana da Conceição Alves FariaNorth Region Health Administration, 4000-447 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-0080
Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral TelesSchool of Economics, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7969-1403
Carla Gomes da RochaInstitute of Health, School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais-Wallis, 1950 Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6302-7732
Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto · PTHES-SO Valais-Wallis · CHInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The repercussions of work environments were widely studied before the pandemic. However, there are still many difficulties to be discovered considering the impact generated by it. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the impact of COVID-19 on nursing practice environments and nurses' job satisfaction. (2) Methods: A correlational study was conducted in a hospital in northern Portugal, with the participation of 416 registered nurses. Data were collected in June 2021 through questionnaires. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. (3) Results: COVID-19 had a favourable impact on the structure component of the practice environments; the process component decreased compared to the pre-pandemic period; the outcome component remained moderately favourable to the quality of care. Nurses were not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with their valuation and remuneration; moderately satisfied with the leadership and staffing; and satisfied with the organisation and resources, co-workers and valuation by patients and families. In more favourable environments, nurses' job satisfactions were higher. (4) Conclusions: Identifying the dimensions with the best and worst scores allowed the institution's managers to concentrate efforts on where improvements were needed, thus preparing professional contexts for the recovery of care activities.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesNursing Staff, HospitalHumansJob SatisfactionPortugalSurveys and Questionnairescoronavirus infectionhospitalsjob satisfactionpandemicwork environment

Identifiers

PMID36554789
PMCPMC9779541
OpenAlexW4312195881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.