Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554750›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

An Evidence and Consensus-Based Definition of Second Victim: A Strategic Topic in Healthcare Quality, Patient Safety, Person-Centeredness and Human Resource Management.

Kris Vanhaecht, Deborah Seys, Sophia Russotto, Reinhard Strametz, José Mira, Sigurbjörg Sigurgeirsdóttir, Albert W Wu, Kaja Põlluste, Daniela Georgeta Popovici, Raluca Sfetcu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
35.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Kris VanhaechtLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5636-4792
Deborah SeysLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4966-3879
Sophia RussottoDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Science, 65183 Wiesbaden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9920-8674
José MiraThe Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-083X
Sigurbjörg SigurgeirsdóttirDepartment of Political Science, University of Iceland, 102 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Albert W WuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, ML 21205, USA.
Kaja PõllusteDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-8871-1397
Daniela Georgeta PopoviciNational Institute of Health Services Management, 021253 Bucharest, Romania.
Raluca SfetcuNational Institute of Health Services Management, 021253 Bucharest, Romania.
Sule KurtLeuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Massimiliano PanellaDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy.
European Researchers’ Network Working on Second Victims (ERNST)
KU Leuven · BENational School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development · ROUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITJohns Hopkins University · USKaradeniz Technical University · TRRheinMain University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of second victims (SV) was introduced 20 years ago to draw attention to healthcare professionals involved in patient safety incidents. The objective of this paper is to advance the theoretical conceptualization and to develop a common definition. A literature search was performed in Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL (October 2010 to November 2020). The description of SV was extracted regarding three concepts: (1) involved persons, (2) content of action and (3) impact. Based on these concepts, a definition was proposed and discussed within the ERNST-COST consortium in 2021 and 2022. An international group of experts finalized the definition. In total, 83 publications were reviewed. Based on expert consensus, a second victim was defined as: "Any health care worker, directly or indirectly involved in an unanticipated adverse patient event, unintentional healthcare error, or patient injury and who becomes victimized in the sense that they are also negatively impacted". The proposed definition can be used to help to reduce the impact of incidents on both healthcare professionals and organizations, thereby indirectly improve healthcare quality, patient safety, person-centeredness and human resource management.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatient SafetyConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansQuality of Health CareWorkforcehealthcare professionalshealthcare qualityhuman resource managementpatient safetyperson-centerednesssecond victim

Identifiers

PMID36554750
PMCPMC9779047
OpenAlexW4311616316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.