Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554742›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Research on the Governance Relationship among Stakeholders of Construction Waste Recycling Based on ANP-SNA.

Siling Yang, Jie Qiu, Heping Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siling YangCollege of City Construction, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China.
Jie QiuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China.
Heping HuangInstitute of Ecological Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A method based on Analytic Network Process and Social Network Analysis (ANP-SNA) was proposed in this paper to determine and better clarify the governance relationship among various stakeholders involved. Firstly, fourteen stakeholders of construction waste recycling were identified using the snowball sampling method, and the governance relationships of these stakeholders were summarized into four aspects with eight indicators. Secondly, the weights of the stakeholder governance relationship indicators were determined based on Analytic Network Process (ANP). Thirdly, the Social Network Analysis (SNA) method was used to model the governance relationship network of the stakeholders, and the governance relationships among different stakeholders in the network were described by quantitative analysis of network cohesion, network centrality, structural holes, and other indicators. Finally, key points for optimizing the governance relationships among stakeholders of construction waste recycling were proposed in this paper, so as to provide a new solution for the collaborative governance of stakeholders.

Indexed as

Recyclinganalytic network processconstruction waste recyclingsocial network analysisstakeholder

Identifiers

PMID36554742
PMCPMC9779675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.