Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554644›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Management of the Medico-Legal Dispute of Healthcare-Related SARS-CoV-2 Infections: Evaluation Criteria and Case Study in a Large University Hospital in Northwest Italy from 2020 to 2021.

Rosario Barranco, Isabella Caristo, Filippo Spigno, Marta Ponzano, Alessio Trevisan, Alessio Signori, Antonio Di Biagio, Francesco Ventura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The State-of-the-Art ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rosario BarrancoDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Isabella CaristoDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Filippo SpignoDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Marta PonzanoDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4091-4686
Alessio TrevisanTransfusion Medicine, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Alessio SignoriDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.
Antonio Di BiagioInfectious Diseases Unit, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-5089
Francesco VenturaDepartment of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-793X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare-related SARS-CoV-2 infection is an issue of particular concern during the pandemic. It has important repercussions on the National Health System, which represents a source of medical-legal health disputes. In the healthcare context, there are reports of negative screening at hospital admission (via nasopharyngeal swabs) and subsequent diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospitalization. Such cases cannot be considered a priori of healthcare-related infections but require extensive in-depth evaluation. In this study, we propose an empirical classification to frame cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed in the hospital (first negative admission swab, with subsequent positive test during hospitalization). The classification is based on five categories: nosocomial, probably nosocomial, indeterminate, probably community, and community cases. We analyzed patients who died after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 during hospitalization (with initial negative screening) in the largest hospital in Northwest Italy from February 2020 to 31 December 2021. A total of 383 cases were tracked and are listed as follows: 41 cases (11%) were classified as nosocomial (i.e., 3.2% of COVID-19 deaths). In contrast, 71 cases (19%) were classified as probably nosocomial, 69 (18%) were indeterminate (i.e., the clinical, radiological, and laboratory characteristics did not provide information on the genesis of the infection), 166 (43%) were classified as probably community cases, and 36 (9%) were defined as community cases. Deceased patients with nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection constituted the following: 3.23% (41/1266) with respect to the total number of COVID-19 deaths, 1.1% (41/3789) with respect to those who entered the hospital with a negative swab and 0.82% (41/4672) with respect to the total of deaths from any cause of death. In this paper we discuss the topic and issues of nosocomial COVID-19 in hospitalized patients and address the medicolegal implications.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross InfectionDissent and DisputesHospitals, UniversityHumansItalySARS-CoV-2COVID-19healthcare-related SARS-CoV-2legal medicinemedico-legal disputesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36554644
PMCPMC9779686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.