Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554620›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Modeling: Activity Concentration of Radon, Thoron, and Their Decay Products in Closed Systems.

Krystian Skubacz, Bogusław Michalik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Krystian SkubaczCentral Mining Institute, Silesian Centre for Environmental Radioactivity, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6858-7774
Bogusław MichalikCentral Mining Institute, Silesian Centre for Environmental Radioactivity, Plac Gwarków 1, 40-166 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-4856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article presents a model for simulating changes in the activity concentration of radon and thoron as well as their progeny in closed or poorly ventilated systems. A system can be considered closed when a stream of radon and thoron flows into a space, but nothing comes out. It was also assumed that there may be devices or installations with a filtering system that would reduce the concentration of radon and thoron decay products. These assumptions may, therefore, correspond to a situation in which, in an isolated chamber, the calibration of radon hazard-monitoring devices is carried out, and nuclides are supplied from an emanation or flow through sources or well-isolated spaces in an environment where the source of nuclides is, for example, radon and thoron exhalation. The differential equations were formulated on the basis of the assumption that the activity concentration of radionuclides of concern in the space is uniform. The equations do not consider possible losses due to diffusion or the inertial or gravitational deposition of aerosols. If these phenomena have a limited impact on changes in the activity concentration of nuclides, the solutions provided may be used to simulate the activity concentration of radon and thoron and their decay products in any confined space assuming different boundary conditions.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, RadioactiveAir Pollution, IndoorRadiation MonitoringRadonHousingRadon DaughtersAir Pollutants, RadioactiveRadonRadon Daughtersactivity concentrationapplicationcalibration facilitymodelpoorly ventilated spacespotential alpha energy concentrationradon and thoron progeny

Identifiers

PMID36554620
PMCPMC9779409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.