Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554616›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Digital Forms of Commensality in the 21st Century: A Scoping Review.

Maína Ribeiro Pereira-Castro, Adriano Gomes Pinto, Tamila Raposo Caixeta, Renata Alves Monteiro, Ximena Pamela Díaz Bermúdez, Ana Valéria Machado Mendonça

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Use of Mukbang in Health Promotion: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maína Ribeiro Pereira-CastroGraduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2771-4989
Adriano Gomes PintoStudy Group in Communication, Culture, Technology, and Food-COMTELA, School of Education and Health Sciences, University Center of Brasília, Brasília 70790-075, Brazil.
Tamila Raposo CaixetaResidency Program in Public Health Policy Management, Fiocruz School of Government, Fiocruz, Brasília 70904-130, Brazil.
Renata Alves MonteiroDepartment of Nutrition, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9188-235X
Ximena Pamela Díaz BermúdezGraduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3771-7684
Ana Valéria Machado MendonçaGraduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social act of eating together has been influenced and mediated by technologies in recent decades. This phenomenon has been investigated in different academic fields, but the topic is still in an incipient dimension, and there is a lack of consensus regarding terminology and definitions. The study aimed to characterize the main scientific findings regarding digital forms of commensality in the 21st century and to identify possible relationships between these practices and public health. A scoping review was conducted to identify papers published in different languages between 2001 and 2021. A total of 104 publications that combined commensality and technology in all contexts were included. Most studies were qualitative; from the Design and Technology field; used social media and video platforms or prototypes/augmented reality gadgets; and used different terms to refer to digital forms of commensality, allowing the analysis of the construction of field definitions over time. The intersections with health were observed from impacts on family/community engagement, culinary skills development, and mental health and eating habits. These practices also structured specific social interactions, such as virtual food communities and commensality, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper indicates the consistent growth of these practices and recommends the development of future research for theoretically and longitudinally deeper evaluations of the impacts of these new ways of eating together, especially regarding their effects on human health.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFeeding BehaviorFoodHumansPublicationsdigital commensalityeating togetherfood practicesfood studiessocial diningtechnology

Identifiers

PMID36554616
PMCPMC9779162
OpenAlexW4311358621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.