Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554553›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Trends in Telecare Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Nilufer Korkmaz Yaylagul, Hande Kirisik, Joana Bernardo, Carina Dantas, Willeke van Staalduinen, Maddalena Illario, Vincenzo De Luca, João Apóstolo, Rosa Silva

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nilufer Korkmaz YaylagulDepartment of Gerontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Akdeniz, Antalya 07070, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-7968
Hande KirisikElderly Care Program, Vocational School of Haymana, University of Ankara, Ankara 06860, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2395-7855
Joana BernardoHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000-076 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3614-9061
Carina DantasSHINE 2Europe, 3030-163 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9887-7622
Willeke van StaalduinenAFEdemy-Academy on Age-Friendly Environments in Europe, 2806 ED Gouda, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-7683
Maddalena IllarioDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9834-6517
Vincenzo De LucaDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6115-931X
João ApóstoloHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000-076 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3050-4264
Rosa SilvaHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), 3000-076 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3947-7098
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra · PTUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITAkdeniz University · TRAnkara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scoping review was conducted to map and analyze the concept of telecare services and the trends in telecare use. This scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework. A search was conducted in CINAHL (via EBSCO), ERIC, Academic Search Ultimate, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases. This scoping review considered quantitative (e.g., analytical observational studies, including prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control, analytical cross-sectional, and descriptive-observational studies), qualitative (e.g., phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and action research), and mixed-method primary studies. Forty research articles published from 1 January 2012, to 1 January 2022 were included in this review, these studies met the eligibility criteria as all were focused on telecare and targeting older adults over 65 living at home. The reviewers coded the data in an Excel spreadsheet, including the articles' title, year, author, journal information and subject, research methods, sample size, location, and summary. Then, the researchers analyzed the conceptual definitions, measurement techniques, and findings in detail and the findings were grouped into categories. The trends around the concept of telecare are independent living, remote care, aging in place, and safety. Telecare research focuses mainly on service use, chronic illness, ethics, and cost-effectiveness. Technology acceptance among older individuals is a critical factor for telecare use. The results found in the literature about the cost-effectiveness of telecare are inconsistent.

Indexed as

Independent LivingTelemedicineAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective Studieshomeolder adultstelecaretelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36554553
PMCPMC9779196
OpenAlexW4312124507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.