Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554498›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

The Use of Elastic Bands in Velocity-Based Training Allows Greater Acute External Training Stimulus and Lower Perceived Effort Compared to Weight Plates.

Carlos Babiloni-Lopez, Javier Gene-Morales, Angel Saez-Berlanga, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, Juan Antonio Moreno-Murcia, Juan C Colado

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Babiloni-LopezResearch Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Javier Gene-MoralesResearch Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5901-5245
Angel Saez-BerlangaResearch Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8832-5250
Rodrigo Ramirez-CampilloExercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, 7591538 Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2035-3279
Juan Antonio Moreno-MurciaDepartment of Sport Sciences-Sport Research Centre, Miguel Hernández University, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-4859
Juan C ColadoResearch Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3255-3940
Universitat de València · ESUniversidad Andrés Bello · CLUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to compare the mean propulsive velocity (MPV), maximum power (PMAX), heart rate, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) during the parallel squat using elastic bands (EB) or weight plates (WP) to load the bar. The effect of relative strength on the dependent variables was analysed. Additionally, the potential of the RPE to predict external load parameters was assessed. Eighteen trained volunteers squatted at 40%, 55%, 70%, and 85% of their one-repetition maximum with EB and WP (a total of eight sets) in random order. Dependent variables were measured at the first and last repetition (i.e., 10% velocity loss). Two identical sessions were conducted to assess the reliability of measurements. Compared to WP, EB allowed a significantly greater number of repetitions, MPV, and PMAX, and significantly lower RPE. The RPE of the first repetition was a significant predictor of the external load of the set. The RPE showed good repeatability and was not influenced by the relative strength of athletes. In conclusion, compared to WP, the use of EB allows for greater external load with reduced internal load responses in a wide spectrum of load-based intensities. The potential implications of these novel findings are discussed in the manuscript.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAthletesHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPerceptionPhysical ExertionReproducibility of Resultsexercisehuman physical conditioningmuscle strengthmusculoskeletal and neural physiological phenomenaphysical fitnessresistance training

Identifiers

PMID36554498
PMCPMC9779371
OpenAlexW4311135313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.