Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554458›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Deferral of Non-Emergency Cardiovascular Interventions Triggers Increased Cardiac Emergency Admissions-Analysis of the COVID-19 Related Lockdown.

Dominik Felbel, Sascha d'Almeida, Manuel Rattka, Stefanie Andreß, Kathrin Reischmann, Benjamin Mayer, Armin Imhof, Dominik Buckert, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Sinisa Markovic and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominik FelbelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Sascha d'AlmeidaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Manuel RattkaDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3269-3871
Stefanie AndreßDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Kathrin ReischmannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Benjamin MayerInstitute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1042-9006
Armin ImhofDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7452-303X
Dominik BuckertDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Wolfgang RottbauerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Sinisa MarkovicDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Tilman StephanDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on the relation between non-emergency and emergency cardiac admission rates during the COVID-19 lockdown and post-lockdown period are sparse.

methodsConsecutive cardiac patients admitted to our tertiary heart center between 1 January and 30 June 2020 were included. The observation period of 6 months was analyzed in total and divided into three defined time periods: the pre-lockdown (1 January-19 March), lockdown (20 March-19 April), and post-lockdown (20 April-30 June) period. These were compared to the reference periods 2019 and 2022 using daily admission rates and incidence rate ratios (IRR).

resultsOver the observation period from 1 January to 30 June, cardiac admissions (including non-emergency and emergency) were comparable between 2019, 2020, and 2022 (n = 2889, n = 2952, n = 2956;

conclusionsWe demonstrate a drastic surge of emergency cardiac admissions post-COVID-19 related lockdown suggesting that patients who did not keep their non-emergency appointment had to be admitted as an emergency later on.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlEmergenciesHospitalizationHumansRetrospective Studiesadmissioncardiac eventCOVID-19deferralemergencylockdownlockdown strategiesnon-emergency

Identifiers

PMID36554458
PMCPMC9778764
OpenAlexW4312124035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.